Here is a cogent foray in the world of economics and national policies.  I found this article brought to my attention factors which I had not examined.  So much antipathy toward China makes it hard, especially during our own hard times, to see clearly.  This is especially true with areas about which we personally know few facts or have only stereotypes.  Below are some portions from the short article The Death of Manufacturing ……. in China by Adam Ozimek.  It appears in the blog Modeled Behavior, found at http://modeledbehavior.com. I also found in another post some interesting statistics about Sarah Palin.

The brightest economic story in the world these days is that China’s wages are rising so fast that low-end manufacturing is beginning to shift into other countries lower on the development ladder. A beautiful illustration comes from today’s NYT in an article on how jobs are shifting from China to Bangladesh. This is the progress of globalization that critics scoffed at:

“As costs have risen in China, long the world’s shop floor, it is slowly losing work to countries like Bangladesh, Vietnam and Cambodia — at least for cheaper, labor-intensive goods like casual clothes, toys and simple electronics that do not necessarily require literate workers and can tolerate unreliable transportation systems and electrical grids.

Li & Fung, a Hong Kong company that handles sourcing and apparel manufacturing for companies like Wal-Mart and Liz Claiborne, reported that its production in Bangladesh jumped 20 percent last year, while China, its biggest supplier, slid 5 percent.

Among developing countries, Bangladesh is the third-biggest exporter of clothing after mainland China, which exported $120 billion in 2008, and Turkey, a distant No. 2, according to the World Trade Organization.

And with nearly 70 million people of working age, Bangladesh could probably absorb many more of China’s 20 million garment industry jobs.”

I would suspect that American protectionists can see that the shift of low-end manufacturing from China to Bangladash is a good thing, as Bangladesh is lower on the development ladder and harming the worse off Bangladeshi workers to protect the better off Chinese workers would be wrong. They probably also recognize that this shift represents the best hope for a country like Bangladesh to move up the development ladder, and using protectionism to get in the way of that in order to preserve Chinese jobs would also be wrong. Why can’t they see the same is true of American protectionism as well?


About Fr. Orthohippo

The blog of a retired Anglican priest (MSJ), his musings, journey, humor, wonderment, and comments on today's scene.
This entry was posted in cultural blinders, economics, politics, Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s