You are Peter: a critical analysis of the Orthodox view of papal primacy in view of an alternative way of exercising papal primacy


May you live in interesting time.  This is an ancient Chinese curse.  One might think it somehow has been applied to the present Christian liturgical world. Most of us have been raised to believe that large institutions change very slowly, and church institution even more slowly.

Well, this has been, since the reign of the current occupant of the See of St. Peter in Rome, turned topsy turvy. Most of the change seem to have been initiated by Pope Benedict XVI.

Two examples during this period: The Anglican world has become completely fractured with many active worldwide Anglicans in the process of severing ties with the ancient Anglican See of Canterbury in England as well as the Episcopal Church in the USA.  The intent is for the various Anglo Catholic and some other groups to establish a conciliar Anglican See.

The process involving the question of the primacy of Rome with the Eastern Orthodox Churches may actually bring an acceptable mutual understanding of the role and relationship of both sides.  It is entirely possible that such an announcement may come as early as next Spring.

Talk about challenges to accepted ways of viewing one’s Church and its relationship with the larger body of Christ. The excerpts from the article below show some of the thinking which has yielded this ferment and possibility.


Deo Gloria—— Fr, Orthohippo  (photo is actually of me)

Journal of Ecumenical Studies/winter 2010/ by Vitalis Mshanga.You will find more by visiting this site.

Journal of Ecumenical Studies | Find Articles at BNEThttp://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3236/is_1_45/ai_n53201508/?tag=content;col1


I. Introduction

Written in Latin, around the base of the big dome in the interior of Saint Peter’s Basilica in Rome, are the following words: Tu es Petrus et super hanc petram aedificabo ecclesiam meam et tibi dabo claves regni caelorum. This phrase is an extract from Mt. 16:17-19, which presents Jesus’ words to the apostle Peter: “I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church…. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven.” (1) It is clear that this inscription is indicative of the mission entrusted to Peter. Very often in Roman Catholic circles–and not without criticism–reference has been made to this text in support of papal primacy. (2) Papal ministry, which is considered a symbol and instrument of the church’s unity, has paradoxically turned out to be a stumbling block on the road toward such unity. (3) This is so partly because of the manner in which papal ministry understands itself and has exercised its authority down through the centuries. (4) Orthodox theologians such as Mesrob Krikorian, emeritus archbishop of the Armenian Apostolic Church, have consistently criticized the traditional Catholic understanding and the practice of primacy as having evolved from being a ministry of service to an instrument of power and authority. (5) The many criticisms levied against this ministry indicate the need for thoroughgoing revision of its understanding and exercise.

Traditionally speaking, papal primacy has often been linked with the primacy of the city of Rome as the head of the world (caput mundi). Rome was considered to be caput mundi because of a number of factors, such as “the dignity of Rome as the only apostolic church in the West, the tradition that both Peter and Paul had been martyred there, the long history of Rome as capital of the Empire, and its continuing position as the chief center of commerce and communications.” (6) Consequently, up until today, the Church of Rome and its bishop are considered as representing the unity and universality of the church. According to Francis Dvornik, there are two principles that shaped the understanding of primacy in the Western and Oriental churches. While the Western Church stresses the “principle of apostolicity,” the Oriental Church emphasizes the “principle of accommodation” in the organization of the church. (7) This means that whereas the church Fathers in the West stressed the primacy of the see of Rome on the basis of the apostolic and Petrine origin of the see, the Oriental Fathers emphasized the significance of the sees of Constantinople, Antioch, and Alexandria based on modeling the ecclesiastical organization after the political system of the imperial provinces. Therefore, in the West, the “principle of apostolicity” gave popes uncontested authority to govern, judge, and issue decrees to all holy churches of God throughout the world. (8) Historians believe that not only Christ but also holy councils bestowed such prerogative on the Holy See.

This essay, therefore, undertakes a critical examination of the Orthodox understanding of primacy, in view of proposing a model of papal primacy befitting the contemporary ecumenical situation. I will argue that the model of primacy fitting for the third millennium is the “primacy in communion.” In view of this, I shall proceed in four steps: first, I shall present the Roman Catholic understanding of papal primacy. Second, I shall present the Orthodox understanding of authority in general and primacy in particular. Third, I shall examine the Orthodox understanding of papal primacy in order to propose a new way for papal primacy to be understood and exercised. Finally, I shall offer an alternative model of exercising papal ministry. The question that lurks in the background of this study is: In the light of Orthodox criticisms regarding papal primacy, what could be the most appropriate model of papal primacy in the contemporary ecumenical situation? (9) Let us begin with the Roman Catholic view of papal primacy.

II. Roman Catholic Understanding of Papal Primacy

Papal primacy is a thorny issue in the Roman Catholic Church ad intra and ad extra. (10) It is not a surprise, therefore, that papal primacy has become a favorite subject in recent ecumenical dialogues. Two reasons may help to explain why this is so. First, there is a growing need for a clear theological basis for “papal primacy”; this has been occasioned in turn by the rise of new methods and skills of biblical scholarship coupled with a renewed ecumenical dispensation. Second, and more importantly, the day-to-day functioning of papal primacy has raised pertinent questions, many of which have to do with the prestige and power that are associated with this ministry. Hence, for example, the former archbishop of San Francisco, John Quinn, in 1999 published a book titled The Reform of the Papacy, in which he lamented a lack of consultation and the centralization of power to the curia leading to what he called a “self-seeking” type of papacy in the Catholic Church. He maintained that the papacy needs to undergo thorough reform to allow for “[c]ollegiality, participation of the laity, decentralization, and greater openness to diversity.” (11) With regard to the participation of the laity, Quinn called for consultation of the laity in the appointment of bishops. The pope’s appointment of bishops by consulting merely the clergy at the expense of the laity contributes to poorly received and ineffective bishops. Hence, Quinn pleaded for aggionamento in the self-understanding and function of papal ministry, in the light of the renewed ecumenical dispensation.

via You are Peter: a critical analysis of the Orthodox view of papal primacy in view of an alternative way of exercising papal primacy | Journal of Ecumenical Studies | Find Articles at BNET.

Advertisements

About Fr. Orthohippo

The blog of a retired Anglican priest (MSJ), his musings, journey, humor, wonderment, and comments on today's scene.
This entry was posted in Anglican, authority, catholic, christian, culture differences, episcopal, historical theology, history, History & eyeball remembrances, multiethnic, orthodox, theology, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to You are Peter: a critical analysis of the Orthodox view of papal primacy in view of an alternative way of exercising papal primacy

  1. bet365 says:

    Good day I was luck to find your theme in bing
    your Topics is outstanding
    I learn much in your Topics really thanks very much
    btw the theme of you website is really marvelous
    where can find it

  2. bet365 says:

    hello I was fortunate to look for your topic in digg
    your Topics is outstanding
    I learn a lot in your Topics really thanks very much
    btw the theme of you blog is really fabulous
    where can find it

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s