Saying he wants “to recover a more authentic Catholic worship,” Bishop Edward J. Slattery of Tulsa, Okla., has announced that he will return to the ancient custom of ad orientem, in which the presider at Mass does not face the people in the pews, but turns to face the altar.
Having the priest face the congregation was one of the major liturgical changes brought to the Mass during the Second Vatican Council (1962-65). Slattery said this change had had unforeseen, negative consequences that he hoped to counter by reverting to the ad orientem tradition.
As Slattery’s decision became widely publicized in late August, Vatican officials were downplaying a report that major liturgical reforms are being considered by Pope Benedict XVI, including a curb on the practice of receiving Communion in the hand.
Slattery explained his reasoning in the September issue of the Eastern Oklahoma Catholic, his diocesan magazine.
He wrote that ad orientem, which literally means “toward the East” or the direction from which Jesus would return for the Second Coming, was the liturgical norm for nearly 18 centuries.
Slattery wrote, “It’s incorrect to think that only the priest offers Mass. All the faithful share in the offering, even though the priest has a unique role. He stands ‘in the person of Christ,’ the historic head of the Mystical Body, so that, at Mass, it is the whole body of Christ — head and members together that make the offering.
“From ancient times, the position of the priest and the people reflected this understanding of the Mass … Everyone — celebrant and congregation — faced the same direction, since they were united with Christ in offering to the Father Christ’s unique, unrepeatable and acceptable sacrifice.”
He continued: “In the last 40 years, however, this shared orientation was lost. Now the priest and the people have become accustomed to facing in opposite directions. The priest faces the people while the people face the priest, even though the eucharistic prayer is directed to the Father and not to the people.
“This innovation was introduced after the Vatican Council, partly to help the people understand the liturgical action of the Mass by allowing them to see what was going on, and partly as an accommodation to contemporary culture where people who exercise authority are expected to face directly the people they serve, like a teacher sitting behind her desk.”
This change brought by Vatican II, he wrote, had “unforeseen and largely negative effects,” including:
- “It was a serious rupture with the church’s ancient tradition.”
- “It can give the appearance that the priest and the people were engaged in a conversation about God, rather than the worship of God.”
- “It places an inordinate importance on the personality of the celebrant by placing him on a kind of liturgical stage.”
Slattery said that he will use the ad orientem position when he celebrates Mass at his cathedral. He did not order his priests to follow his example, but he does note that “Benedict has spoken repeatedly of the importance of celebrating Mass ad orientem,” as part of his urging Catholics “to draw upon the ancient liturgical practice of the church to recover a more authentic Catholic worship.”
rest of article Dennis Coday Aug. 21, 2009