UN torture panel slams Vatican on sex-abuse scandal, says responsible for cases worldwide
GENEVA – The Vatican exercises effective worldwide control over its bishops and priests and must comply with the United Nations’ anti-torture treaty globally, a U.N. committee found Friday in a report that could expose the Catholic Church to new legal arguments by victims of clerical sex abuse.
The U.N. Committee Against Torture concluded that Vatican officials failed to report abuse charges properly, moved priests rather than disciplined them, and failed to pay adequate compensation to victims. Though the panel stopped short of finding that the Holy See had violated its obligations under the anti-torture treaty, which it ratified in 2002, panel members said that was implicit in the criticisms.
“Legal scholars will tell you that when the committee addresses a problem and makes a recommendation, it sees the state as not meeting the requirements of the convention,” the panel’s vice chairperson, Felice Gaer, told reporters. “It’s absolutely clear what we’re saying.”
But the Vatican dismissed the 10-member panel’s central conclusions as “fundamentally flawed” and insisted it didn’t exercise direct control over its priests worldwide.
The report’s most immediate impact may be to strengthen the case for victims pressing for the Vatican to take more legal responsibility for priests who raped and molested children. The Holy See long has sought to distance itself from the conduct of pedophile priests and the bishops overseeing them, saying the church’s own structure isn’t the centrally organized, top-down hierarchy that lawyers for victims often describe.
Earlier this month, the Holy See revealed to the committee that it had defrocked 848 priests and imposed lesser penalties on 2,572 others since 2004. Those figures reflected only those complaints handled directly by the Holy See, not those left in the hands of dioceses, so the total number of sanctioned priests worldwide could be much higher.
Crucially, the committee rejected the Holy See’s position that it should be legally liable for enforcing the treaty only within the tiny confines of Vatican City itself. Church leaders consistently have argued that legal responsibility for abuse lies with bishops and leaders of individual congregations of priests, nuns and brothers many thousands of miles (kilometers) from church headquarters.
The committee said the Vatican must ensure that the treaty isn’t violated by its representatives anywhere worldwide. It said the Vatican’s contention that it did not enforce control over church personnel outside Vatican City — therefore its commitments to the U.N. torture treaty should apply only within Vatican City borders — was “not consistent” with the treaty or the Vatican’s own laws.
The panel said ratifying parties to the torture treaty, including the Vatican, “bear international responsibility for the acts and omissions of their officials and others acting in an official capacity or acting on behalf of the state.”
In reply Friday, the Vatican accused the panel of sloppy reasoning. It insisted the committee was wrong “to give the impression that all the priests serving around the world are indirectly, legally tied to the Vatican.”
In its statement the Vatican said it was not even indirectly responsible for enforcing the treaty’s anti-torture obligations on all the world’s 440,000 priests, and the Vatican’s own laws do not imply such a level of legal control.
Asked about that statement, Gaer told reporters: “We’re not suggesting that the Holy See is responsible for the actions of every Catholic. But the officials of the Holy See do exercise control over a significant range of conduct that takes place outside the four corners of Vatican City.”
The Vatican stressed that the committee’s report had not explicitly stated whether it even believes that rape and sexual abuse constitute a form of torture and therefore violate the Holy See’s treaty obligations. It said the U.N. report makes “an implicit fundamental assumption” that any sexual abuse is equivalent to torture, an assumption not supported by the treaty.